Two Things To Learn From The Cisco Fatty

o-hai-googlz-i-can-has-privacy.jpgIf you haven’t heard of the Cisco Fatty yet, you’ve either been living in a cave or you’ve started the 12-step Save Me From Twitter program. Good for you… stay strong.

The Cisco Fatty is the story of grad student Connor Riley (@theconnor) who Tweeted the following:

“Cisco just offered me a job! Now I have to weigh the utility of a fatty paycheck against the daily commute to San Jose and hating the work.”

To which Tim Levad (@timmylevad) – a Channel Partner at Cisco – replied:

“Who is the hiring manager. I’m sure they would love to know that you will hate the work. We here at Cisco are versed in the web.”

Now, what is one to learn from this? Any idiot would jump to say, “Don’t run your mouth on Twitter!” and most of them have.  I take a much different stance.

Lesson #1: Where were the LOLz?

RegretsClearly Tim Levad doesn’t have much of a sense of humor when it comes to Cisco. Does that mean Connor Riley can’t joke? Or for that matter, should we stop ribbing the people we rib every day on Twitter? Is everybody’s ego so freakin’ fragile or tied to what they do that they can’t take a joke?

Does that mean that if we bitch about our former co-workers we should make our profiles private? Hell no.

Transparency is everything. Nobody likes being lied to – and if you have even a smidgen of people skills, you’re able to tell when someone isn’t telling you the whole truth. That’s what’s so damn great about Twitter. 140 characters of 100% pure, unadulterated truth. You just can’t lie with that few characters.

Why would you ever want to punish honesty? Okay, so, there might be some truth to Connor’s joke, but at least you know exactly what Connor Riley is thinking about this job. And any HR professional will tell you that trying to get inside the mind of new recruits is not easy to do under other circumstances.

If we can learn anything from this atrocity of social media madness, we can learn that – really – this should have been no big deal. It was only a lack of LOLz from Tim-may and an over-zealous community that made it into the beast it’s become. Tim-may and everybody else should have gotten a giggle and moved on.

Should Connor have known better? No. She was playing by the rules of la vie boheme de Social Media: Truth, Transparency, and LOLz.

Lesson #2: Over-reaction Makes a Bad Situation Worse

Dolphins and CowsMean people exist in surprisingly large numbers. I’d normally call them Trolls, but, in this case… even education strategist John Connell (@JConnell) at Cisco agrees: “Have to say, I thought it was a bit priggish of our colleague to feed her to the lions”. Nobody, by the way, has called John out for his tweet.

The Internet used to be a place where verbal jousting was an Olympic-caliber game – those who were good at it were praised.  Those who were bad at it went home to try, try again.

It was all public (amongst nerds, at least) – and nobody’s feelings got trounced because that was how the game was played. Social media is now a much more public arena, but still very much the same as those old Usenet groups.

Just like in real life, though – the game becomes much more intense when a batter rushes the mound at some imaginary slight, the enforcer throws down on the ice, or nobody tells Cutler he’s gonna be traded. Over-reaction causes a bad situation to get much, much worse.

What I mean is – as the situation escalated, Connor Riley did what most of us would do: she tried to make everything private again – by deleting or hiding her social media tools. Unfortunately, this was the wrong approach. If you don’t control your own voice, someone else will: and speculation will take over in the place of facts (or at least first-hand accounts)!

Internet-savvy stalkers found Connor’s homepage, her Flickr account, and even looked up her old website on Google’s cached history, publishing them all for the world to see.

When Connor deleted or hid her social media tools – she effectively silenced herself… but she didn’t hide herself.

Which brings me to my final, scary point: There’s no going back. For any of us. The cow is out of the water.

The only option she had was to stand up, laugh at herself (or the situation) and move on. But she didn’t. At least, not yet.

Connor Riley’s story is one that will likely stick with her for the rest of her life, thanks to one inconsiderate Cisco fan’s tweet and Connor’s own over-reaction to the situation. It’s not one that has to HAUNT her. In fact, Connor has already taken the first steps to own this “crisis” and turn it into something not so haunting.  Good for her! Too bad that lesson came with such a huge pricetag.

Share some psychosis:
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • RSS
  • PDF
  • email
  • Print

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon

This entry was posted in Communication Ideas and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • Catbert

    Nick says: “The point of the article is that hurt feelings are no reason to fire an otherwise qualified worker.”


    Catbert says: “Otherwise qualified”??? I’m not sure how you’re able to speak to the qualifications of these individuals. Are you familiar with their work history? Their performance?


    Simple fact-People who display poor judgement, and poor decision-making will have a difficult time remaining employed.


    Regarding any social trauma these individuals endured, I’d call that a self-inflicted wound.


    This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/04/08/stop-social-media-firings/#comment-117360" rel="nofollow" title="“stop social media firings” (http://www.cheezhead.com/)">Cheezhead</p>

  • It is not about social media sites, it is about the loaylty of employees with their employer. When the employer lose the trust in the employee, there is usually just the only one solution.

    People should be always very careful about their posting their job related stories, there is always someone who can read the message and say it to the employer.


    This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/04/08/stop-social-media-firings/#comment-117357" rel="nofollow" title="“stop social media firings” (http://www.cheezhead.com/)">Cheezhead</p>

  • Nick – Its all just good fun, dont worry…the readers here have big shoulders. If your posts dont stir the pot just a little then they wouldnt be very interesting to read. When you see the swarm, you know the topic is a good one. PS I think you should be fired….just kidding


    This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/04/08/stop-social-media-firings/#comment-117345" rel="nofollow" title="“stop social media firings” (http://www.cheezhead.com/)">Cheezhead</p>

  • Not sure what kind of flamewar was started here. Rafael’s point was a valid one, but it wasn’t the point of my article – never meant to dis the guy. So, have your silliness anywhere, just not on my post.


    Rafael, also agreed with you on the confidentiality agreements, unless some sort of moral or ethical dilemma is involved (ie, someone’s gonna get fired, bonuses at AIG, that sort of thing that SHOULD be leaked).


    So… we have 1) personal, vulgar attacks, 2) racism/intolerance and 3) confidentiality agreements.


    Can we please get back to the issue at hand?


    HRBoss – There’s no reason to get ageist about it. The people getting fired for social media mistakes are from every generation. When I post something, I post it as myself. I believe in transparency. When I say something online, which I believe is a fair assessment of the situation, no matter who it pisses off, I take credit for it.


    The point of the article is that hurt feelings are no reason to fire an otherwise qualified worker.


    This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/04/08/stop-social-media-firings/#comment-117337" rel="nofollow" title="“stop social media firings” (http://www.cheezhead.com/)">Cheezhead</p>

  • no one likes a snitch and what comes around, goes around.


    http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/04/09/ved-monster-lawsuit-demands-yahoo-release-name-of-snitch/


    This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/04/08/stop-social-media-firings/#comment-117330" rel="nofollow" title="“stop social media firings” (http://www.cheezhead.com/)">Cheezhead</p>

  • hrboss

    Its there needs to be some sort of awareness in the workforce that if you go public with private information, you’re going to get canned. Some of the new generation doesnt totally understand this yet. Look at the way half these jobfox employees bad mouth the founder and others. They hide their real ID when mouthing off but what kind of character gets angry at someone that gave them a job? Sorry your not a millionare but you had a job for 2 years. And this is how you repay them? Good lord. Point is, more people need to learn something called discretion.


    This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/04/08/stop-social-media-firings/#comment-117328" rel="nofollow" title="“stop social media firings” (http://www.cheezhead.com/)">Cheezhead</p>

  • Leafar is that you attacking people on cheezhead again. You need to get a gym membership bro, all that anger is gonna eat you up.


    This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/04/08/stop-social-media-firings/#comment-117325" rel="nofollow" title="“stop social media firings” (http://www.cheezhead.com/)">Cheezhead</p>

  • Commonsense

    Rafael – I agree with you 100%…the rest of these blokes are just angry cause their unemployment is runnign out.


    This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/04/08/stop-social-media-firings/#comment-117324" rel="nofollow" title="“stop social media firings” (http://www.cheezhead.com/)">Cheezhead</p>

  • leafaR

    Can someone tweet about this twit, Rafael? Make up a name, throw his pic on it, and then tweet about RealMatch sucking wind. a) Its the truth. b) Maybe then we’ll be saved his drivel.


    This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/04/08/stop-social-media-firings/#comment-117319" rel="nofollow" title="“stop social media firings” (http://www.cheezhead.com/)">Cheezhead</p>

  • Nick – I agree that if the situation is horrible then of course an employee needs to do something like telling HR or the boss’s boss so that things can be addressed internally. But whatever you do, dont tweet or is it twit about it. That’s really bad judgement. There is no upside to venting publically….there is only downside.


    This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/04/08/stop-social-media-firings/#comment-117318" rel="nofollow" title="“stop social media firings” (http://www.cheezhead.com/)">Cheezhead</p>

  • Catbert,


    Clearly personal attacks violate the efficacy of the freedom of speech. That wasn’t ever the point of my article.


    Dan Leone didn’t call his boss or any of his employers a “retard”, he said his organization was stupid for trading away his favorite player. Organizations and corporations are public entities and don’t have any sort of protected status that I’m aware of.


    In the case of Connor Riley, she’s been harped on relentlessly for a harmless social media comment about a job she already had decided to turn down.


    Schadenfreude is taken to extremes in these cases. Neither Dan nor Connor deserved the incredible levels of public ridicule they received for their respective “woops” moments, do they?


    Now, if you’re a jackass and posting racist or personal attacks, sure, you’re gonna get burned and probably deserve it. It might still behoove the companies to educate their employees in the first place – it’s not like they teach this stuff in school.


    -Nick


    This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/04/08/stop-social-media-firings/#comment-117317" rel="nofollow" title="“stop social media firings” (http://www.cheezhead.com/)">Cheezhead</p>

  • Rafael,


    In the case of personal attacks, libel or slander laws apply, and I agree with you that such people need to be thwapped. Personal attacks are wrong and should be dealt with accordingly. I disagree that they need to be fired outright.


    Anyone stupid enough to post a personal attack clearly doesn’t understand how social media works. In that case, it falls back onto the employer to correct the problem. If it persists, hell yeah, fire ‘em. But you can’t assume they know better beforehand. Especially if someone has only a handful of followers on Twitter or has done the basics to lock down their Facebook accounts by only friending people they know in real life.


    That being said, personal attacks are outside the scope of my article, but you’ve brought up a good point.


    Back to the scope of the article, how do you justify firing someone with a valid complaint that chooses to complain in the realm of social media? If the boss IS a bonehead or if the situations in the company ARE horrible, doesn’t it fall on the company to address those situations? Surely the right answer can’t be to fire these social media whistle blowers…


    This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/04/08/stop-social-media-firings/#comment-117316" rel="nofollow" title="“stop social media firings” (http://www.cheezhead.com/)">Cheezhead</p>

  • Ed

    Rafael….you missed the boat pal.


    This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/04/08/stop-social-media-firings/#comment-117315" rel="nofollow" title="“stop social media firings” (http://www.cheezhead.com/)">Cheezhead</p>

  • I totally disagree. If an employee is venting to the public that the boss is a bonehead or that things are terrible, they need to be fired. Boss’s are people too and entitled to privacy just like every employee is entitled to privacy. Should the company post that John Doe is stupid, doesn’t understand the business and has clinical ADHD, that he is cronically late and has BO? Don’t you think this would hurt John’s prospects for getting another job? No employee (inclduing the CEO) has the right to decide what’s ok and what’s not ok to make public about other people. It’s not fair for anyone to make public judgments about another person or company and frankly it shows a horrific violation of trust and professional judgment to do that. Anyone that runs around whining about their coworkers gets what they deserve. No one likes a whiner or a snitch. Maybe a few horror stories will make everyone think twice before posting hear say.


    This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/04/08/stop-social-media-firings/#comment-117314" rel="nofollow" title="“stop social media firings” (http://www.cheezhead.com/)">Cheezhead</p>

  • Catbert

    Would it be acceptable for these (or any other) individuals to stand up in the middle of a business meeting and berate their coworkers, subordinates, or superiors? Call them “retards”? How about denigrating their ethnicity…that would be an interesting escalation of your “anything is fair game on the internet” employment policy.


    I don’t understand your concept that internet communications grant some sort of special privelege to say whatever one chooses. Having the opinion that my boss is a “moron”, and voicing that opinion in a public forum are two completely different things. I retain the right to the former, I do not expect (or support) the right to the latter.


    This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/04/08/stop-social-media-firings/#comment-117313" rel="nofollow" title="“stop social media firings” (http://www.cheezhead.com/)">Cheezhead</p>

  • John,

    Thanks for your comment! I really wanted to take a different direction on this article. It's so easy to be overly critical of either side, so I wanted to be fair to both! Hopefully I accomplished that.

    -Nick
  • Cisco SVP of CorpComm Blair Christie blogs about our philosophy on social media:
    http://blogs.cisco.com/news/comments/with_socia...

    She states, in part: "I personally think these tools are an amazing new form of expression and collaboration and as a company, we recognize the opportunity they offer and we encourage their use. It’s normal for people (and companies) to make some mistakes when they use something new and we should all learn from those mistakes."
blog comments powered by Disqus
  • Back To Blog!
  • Psychotic Resumes 101

    Psychotic Resumes is a Gen-Y (Millennial) job survival guide created by Nick Armstrong to help new professionals build stronger resumes and cover letters so they can find a better job. It's our goal to help Gen-Y do better at interviews and on the job, promoting strong leadership, entrepreneurship, and common sense.

    Want to contribute to Psychotic Resumes? Introduce yourself.

  • Psychotic Resumes Contributors

  • Connect With Psychotic Resumes

    Psychotic Resumes on Facebook Nick of Psychotic Resumes on Twitter Nick of Psychotic Resumes on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to Psychotic Resumes

    Subscribe
  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Psychotic Resumes TV

  • Psychotic Resumes Podcast

    Here is the Music Player. You need to installl flash player to show this cool thing!