Personal Branding makes you a Liar – The Tiger Woods Story

"Spot The Tech" - Would you hire these guys?Please attempt to only be 30% of who you really are” is the lesson of Social Media Mullet, today’s article from Jessica Miller-Merrell on Brand-Yourself.com.  ”Business in the front and party in the back” is the basic premise, that your social media profiles should consist of 70% business interaction and 30% personal.  She cites Tiger Woods as an example.

Let me ask you a question.  Does the fact that Tiger was aiming for holes that weren’t on the course make him a less-proficient golfer?  If I’m hiring him to speak on marriage, maybe I pause.  If I’m hiring him to play golf (what he does), then that’s not a problem.

In today’s workplace, would you rather be an interchangeable cog, whose only real differentiation from someone else is how much you charge per year?  Or would you rather be the piece so unique and intricate that your misshapen ass barely fits into the machine?

Jessica will be the first to point out that you can be passionate and professional and unique while using social media.  Common sense dictates that unless you’re applying for a job as a dancer, stripper, or porn star, you don’t publish naked pictures online… and let’s assume for the most part that aside from the occasional stupid mistake, most people are “within reason”.

If you’re muting your personality to the point where 70% of your interactions are “strictly business related”, you’re not being the real you, now are you?

What happens if you only present 30% of yourself when you’re 100% douchebag? (bad for the company)  Or 100% pure awesome? (bad for your job search)

Either way you are a liar, you’re ruining the economy and you’re an idiot.  And you’re going to keep being a liar until you’re 100% you – the only you there is.

"I Am Tiger Woods"Tiger is a good example of personal branding gone wrong.  He does what he loves, no qualms about it.  Occasionally, he f*cks up.  Personal Branding made it worse – he couldn’t be professional “Tiger” and honest, truthful “Tiger” at the same time.  He’s still Gandhi on the golf course.  Some day, he’ll remember who he is and that you can’t be sane and two people at once.

Your professional self is your personal self, one in the same, one person, growing over time.

What kind of company would want to hire someone they knew only 30% about?  What kind of company would penalize you for having a complete, unabashed social media presence if you were a wizard at your profession?  Why do we reward people who want to work for a company that only wants 30% of us?

Share some psychosis:
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • RSS
  • PDF
  • email
  • Print

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon

This entry was posted in Communication Ideas, Job Search Ideas and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • Interesting article. I agree, it's inexcusable to lie online and you should never hide who you are. In fact, just like in a an interview, it can be some of your personal attributes and interests that make you a good fit for a company, rather than purely business credentials.

    However, I think you misinterpreted the post. To me, splitting up your social networking 70/30 does not mean only present 30% of the real you. It means be conscious of how you are utilziing the space. Far too many people flood their social networks with vapid information about their personal lives. What they are doing, where they are going, who they are dating, etc. I bet if you think about it, last time you were on facebook you caught yourself thinking "who cares?" in regards to someones status update.

    If you are using social media as a means to help your job search, than you should certainly keep the 70/30 benchmark in mind. Keep 70 percent of what you say relevant, and only 30 percent purely personal. It doesn't mean you are hiding the real you, it just means you are conscious of who you are talking to. You wouldn't go to a networking event and talk about your ex boyfriend. Same rules apply.

    Good article, keep up the good work.

    Patrick
  • Patrick,

    Thanks for your comment! I think I get disgruntled when anyone puts on a veneer to save face.

    If your boyfriend just dumped you, maybe just prior to the networking event, you're going to either put on a veneer or you're going to be talking about your ex while you network.

    These tools aren't purely for networking or business use; in fact, quite the opposite. They allow us the distinctly unique opportunity to present our story in a way that many more people can access it than with previously used tools. In fact, if most businesses used these tools in the way they were intended - as a social movement - rather than as a marketing platform (which is how I view most aspects of Personal Branding), we would be exiting this recession quite a bit faster.

    Telling a story connects you to the teller in a way that no other medium can. Vapid and poignant share the same space - the only difference is the intent.

    When you "blather", sure, someone will get bored of your melodrama. When you relate a personal experience for the purpose of sharing the story or saving someone else the drama, and even sometimes just being "a real person" by sharing those vapid personal details sparingly (certainly not as much as 30%) you're allowing people to self-select (opt-in) to what is important to them.

    Personally, I don't care about the Oscars or whatever award show just happened. But I'm not going to stop doing business with people or take business contacts less seriously if they show their human side and fill their Twitter, Facebook or Blog with the Oscars on Oscar night... in fact, I much rather they (or my employees or anyone I want to work for) show a human side whenever it strikes 'em. I don't want to be marketed to, I want to be related to.

    Anyway, that's where I'm coming from. Thanks for your response!

    -Nick
  • I completely agree. On the other extreme, far too many people, and espeically businesses use the space purely as a marketing technique. It takes away from the true value of social media, a way in which to connect with like-minded people and share your thoughts and interests. In terms of personal branding, using it purely as a marketing tecnique makes you seem robotic. I like to tell brand-yourself users "If you think of yourself purely as a 'brand' people probably aren't going to enjoy your company as a 'person'

    Take care,

    Patrick
  • The ratio is reasonable if we are talking about tweets ... Brand YOU is more important than Brand Company.

    Our offline character (Private) must be consistent with our online identity (Public), Tiger Woods doesn't have good personal code of honor to build solid base for his character even he made very good personal brand, all gone with the wind now :(
blog comments powered by Disqus
  • Back To Blog!
  • Psychotic Resumes 101

    Psychotic Resumes is a Gen-Y (Millennial) job survival guide created by Nick Armstrong to help new professionals build stronger resumes and cover letters so they can find a better job. It's our goal to help Gen-Y do better at interviews and on the job, promoting strong leadership, entrepreneurship, and common sense.

    Want to contribute to Psychotic Resumes? Introduce yourself.

  • Psychotic Resumes Contributors

  • Connect With Psychotic Resumes

    Psychotic Resumes on Facebook Nick of Psychotic Resumes on Twitter Nick of Psychotic Resumes on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to Psychotic Resumes

    Subscribe
  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Psychotic Resumes TV

  • Psychotic Resumes Podcast

    Here is the Music Player. You need to installl flash player to show this cool thing!